The G8 Test was specifically developed for the demands of competitive dancing. The physical performance level is determined via a specialized test approved for dance sports. This specialized test truly takes all areas of relevant muscles used in dancing under examination. A standard treadmill or cycling test cannot yield this kind of information. Further, in a very early stage, the G8 test takes into account the fact that dancing is performed by couples. This is especially relevant for the preparation of a joint training schedule.
The G8-Test is the ideal combination to identify the physical performance level and developing a personally adjusted training program. The various personal metabolic thresholds are determined based on profound medical knowledge and without the necessity of any blood withdrawal. Based on these findings and taking in consideration the individual circumstances as well as the personal aim, the best possible training plan will be worked out. The G8-method is based on the experience and research of professional dancer Mr. Rafael Grüninger and was focus of his doctoral research study.
The G8-Test was developed in the course of a doctoral study and it has been proven that this is possible. During the eight minutes of the G8-Test (4min. respectively 6min. for seniors), it is a given fact that all of the metabolic thresholds will be surpassed. For this reason, the test is as highly diagnostic as a lactase-based blood analysis.
The G8 Test was developed for Latin as well as for ballroom dancers. The test utilizes a sequence of music which is standardized. For Latin the sequence is based on a cha-cha rhythm, whereas the sequence for Standard/Ballroom dancing is based on the Viennese-Waltz. This way it is possible to compare the rather different requirements for the two types of competitive dancing. During the analytical assessment more detailed differences for the two fields of dances are factored in.
The structure of the training schedule is based on various phases with different load levels and intensities. Based on the principle of supercompensation, the goal is to being able to access a performance peak at the exact required point of time.
During the short term build-up of the lactate tolerance or velocity (short term and focused preparation for a competition), deviations from the training schedule are very difficult to compensate.
In the midterm build-up phase of endurance, small deviations from the training schedule can lead to its failure as well. For the human organism to build up basic endurance, it needs a continuous stimulus for a longer period of time. Any interruption during this phase will trigger the body to go back to onset. The only way to compensate for not precisely sticking to the plan, is to correct it by extending the training period.
There is no doubt that with a heart rate monitor the training effect will be much better and more precise (the training time outside the given heart beat frequencies has almost no, or even a negative training effect). If a cheap no-name product is being used, this can lead to false measurements. The main drawback, however, is the fact that couples cannot be measured simultaneously. Low cost products do not work with multiple transmission channels and interfere with each other. If at all, low end products should only be used when you want to get a rough idea about your individual heart beat during jogging or cycling and when no partner is present.